Your star manager sends a quick text to an employee about covering a shift. Seems harmless, right? Fast forward six months, and that innocent message becomes exhibit A in a costly lawsuit. The employee claims they weren't paid overtime for responding to work texts after hours. Your company just learned an expensive lesson about the hidden legal minefield of workplace texting.
If you think this scenario sounds far-fetched, think again. Companies across the country are discovering that their casual approach to workplace texting is creating serious legal exposure. From massive federal fines to employment discrimination lawsuits, the risks are real and growing.
Let's dive into why smart businesses are moving away from traditional text messaging for workforce communications and what you need to know to protect your company.
The Hidden Legal Minefield of Workplace Texting
Federal Compliance Violations That Could Bankrupt Your Business
TCPA Violations: The Million-Dollar Mistake
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act sounds like something that only affects telemarketers, but it's actually a massive trap for employers. If found in violation of the TCPA, your business can be liable for paying millions of dollars in lawsuits. The law applies to nearly any automated texting system, regardless of whether you're texting customers or employees.
Here's the kicker: federal texting regulations apply to nearly any use of automated texting systems, regardless of the intended recipients. Even mass texting your own employees about schedule changes can trigger TCPA liability if you don't have proper consent protocols in place.
Legal experts are clear on this point: there is no question that the Telephone Consumer Protection Act can, and often does, apply to messages sent by employers to employees.
The Overtime Trap Hidden in Your Pocket
Think a simple "no working after hours" policy protects you? Think again. Under the Fair Labor Standards Act, if the employer sends or receives an email or text message, or receives or places a call to an employee after hours that is related to the employee's work, the employer is responsible for payment of any overtime incurred, even if that communication is contrary to a written policy forbidding employees from working overtime.
This means when your manager texts an employee about tomorrow's schedule at 9 PM, you might owe overtime pay. Even worse, employers are liable for failure to make these required overtime payments even if the employee fails to record the time and even if the time is in violation of company policy.
Companies like T-Mobile and the City of Chicago have faced multi-million dollar class action settlements over exactly these issues. The message is clear: after-hours texting creates automatic overtime liability.
Healthcare and Other Regulated Industries: Compliance Requirements You Can't Ignore
If you're in healthcare, food service, or other regulated industries, the stakes are particularly high. Healthcare organizations face HIPAA compliance requirements, while food service businesses must navigate predictive scheduling laws and wage and hour regulations that can be triggered by simple text communications.
The lesson? Regulators across all industries take record-keeping seriously, and text messages aren't exempt from compliance requirements.
Harassment and Discrimination: When Casual Goes Criminal
"Textual Harassment" Is Real—And Expensive
Employment lawyers have coined a new term: "textual harassment." Inappropriate text messages have been the basis for claims of discrimination, retaliation and "textual" harassment. Courts have allowed employees to testify about the content of texts and photos exchanged, even when the messages were no longer available as evidence.
The informal nature of texting makes it particularly dangerous. Texts are an informal method of communicating, making it more vulnerable to harassment, jokes and comments that cross the line, and other unprofessional conduct. What starts as workplace banter can quickly escalate into legal liability.
Real Cases, Real Consequences
Employment litigation is increasingly featuring text message evidence. A text can be damning evidence, such as a message saying, "I saw you across the room today, and you looked lovely in your miniskirt," noted one employment attorney. These messages create a permanent record that can be used against employers in harassment and discrimination cases.
Text messages are an easy way to convey messages to others and usually receive a quick response. According to the Pew Research Center, 81 percent of Americans text regularly and 97 percent of Americans text weekly. But this convenience comes with a cost when workplace communications cross professional boundaries.
Discovery and Evidence Preservation: The Nightmare Scenario
Everything Is Discoverable
Here's what many business owners don't realize: courts have generally held that relevant text messages used for business communications should be preserved and are discoverable. This applies even when employees use personal phones for work purposes.
Recent court decisions have made this crystal clear. Text messages can be discoverable on personally owned phones of employees if the company has the right to obtain the text messages that were used for business purposes even if the company does not have control or possession of the employee's phone.
The $10,000+ Sanctions Waiting to Happen
Courts don't mess around when it comes to evidence preservation. Companies should consult with their legal and e-discovery counsel on preservation of text messages because courts continue to find the failure to take reasonable steps to preserve responsive text messages to be sanctionable.
The penalties are real. In Paisley Park Enterprises, Inc. v. Boxill, the court ordered the payments of costs and a fine of $10,000 for failing to preserve text messages. Other cases have resulted in even higher sanctions and adverse jury instructions.
The Litigation Hold Problem
When litigation is anticipated, companies must implement a "litigation hold" to preserve relevant documents. If your text messages are subpoenaed, and you fail to preserve this evidence, you may be subject to significant sanctions. Under amended Rule 37(e), the court may impose sanctions for failing to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) in anticipation of litigation.
The problem? Most companies have no system for preserving employee text messages, especially those on personal devices.
Data Control: You're Flying Blind
The Server Problem
Unlike email systems that companies can control and monitor, text messages present unique challenges. The difficulty with texting in the workplace is that — from the employer's perspective — texting is offline. In workplaces in which email is the primary method of communication, employee emails are usually sent, received and stored on an email server that is maintained by the employer.
With texts, employers do not have ready access to employee texts and are not in a position to preserve them. Unlike emails, texts typically reside on the phones on which they are sent and received.
The BYOD Nightmare
Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) policies compound the problem. Where employees are using their own personal devices in the workplace, the employer would have to require employees to back up their texts to a company-owned computer or server. Even with a protocol in place for backing up texts, an employer could never be sure all texts were being captured as it is possible for employees to delete texts from a phone before the backup occurs.
Record Retention: A Compliance Catastrophe
Industry-Specific Landmines
Different industries face different retention requirements. For public sector employees, text messages related to your work as a public employee are public records, even if you are using your personal cellphone to create them. This means that they are subject to public records requests, legal holds, and records retention requirements, just like any other record.
Financial services firms face even stricter requirements, with some communications requiring indefinite retention.
Why Traditional Text Messaging Can't Be Fixed
Technical Limitations You Can't Overcome
The fundamental problem with workplace texting isn't just policy—it's technology. Whereas emails are housed on servers that can be systematically searched for terms (even long after individual users have 'deleted' the emails), text messages historically have been stored only on the phones of the sender and the recipient.
This creates an impossible situation for compliance. Most carriers only save text message content for 2-3 days. Carriers usually assert the Stored Communications Act as a defense to compliance with a summons.
The Employee Awareness Gap
Many employees operate under dangerous misconceptions about text privacy. Many employees, however, are under the misconception that texting is a private method of communication. They think that text messages, in contrast to e-mails, are untraceable and are not archived.
This false sense of security leads to inappropriate communications that later surface in litigation.
The Business Case for Professional Communication Platforms
Built-in Compliance Features
Professional workforce communication platforms solve the fundamental problems with traditional texting:
- Automatic archiving: All communications are preserved according to your retention policies
- Administrative controls: Managers can delete inappropriate content and control access
- Audit trails: Complete records of who sent what and when
- Legal hold capabilities: Instantly preserve communications when litigation arises
Risk Mitigation That Actually Works
Unlike texting, professional platforms provide:
- Clear separation: Work and personal communications remain distinct
- Centralized control: IT and legal teams can monitor and manage all communications
- Compliance reporting: Automated reports for regulatory requirements
- Content moderation: Real-time monitoring for inappropriate communications
Real-World Success Stories
Companies using professional communication platforms report dramatic improvements. From the case studies, 101 Express reduced annual employee churn by 43% while ensuring all communications remained compliant and documented.
Wendy's achieved full compliance with Oregon's predictive scheduling law by using a platform that automatically tracked when schedules were posted and ensured all employees received timely notifications.
Making the Transition: Your Risk Management Strategy
Immediate Action Items
- Audit your current practices: Document how your organization currently uses text messaging for work purposes
- Update your policies: Employer policies should make it clear that any inappropriate conduct will not be tolerated and is unlawful however it is communicated—whether through text message, e-mail, spoken word, or other means
- Train your team: Educate employees about the legal risks and appropriate communication channels
What to Look for in a Platform
When evaluating professional communication platforms, prioritize:
- Compliance features: Built-in archiving, retention, and audit capabilities
- User adoption: Easy-to-use mobile apps that employees will actually use
- Integration: Seamless connection with your existing HR and scheduling systems
- Support: Dedicated customer success to ensure smooth implementation
Implementation Best Practices
Smart companies take a phased approach:
- Start with pilot groups: Test the platform with a small group before company-wide rollout
- Communicate the why: Help employees understand the legal and business reasons for the change
- Provide training: Ensure everyone knows how to use the new system effectively
- Monitor adoption: Track usage and provide additional support where needed
The Bottom Line: Act Now or Pay Later
The legal landscape around workplace communications is evolving rapidly, and the courts are making it clear that ignorance isn't a defense. Companies that continue relying on traditional text messaging are essentially gambling with their legal and financial future.
Consider the numbers:
- Multiple class action settlements in the millions for overtime violations
- Thousands in sanctions for evidence preservation failures
- Countless harassment and discrimination cases built on text message evidence
Meanwhile, companies using professional communication platforms report better compliance, reduced legal exposure, and improved operational efficiency.
The question isn't whether you can afford to make the switch—it's whether you can afford not to.
Ready to assess your risk? Start by documenting your current text messaging practices and identifying potential compliance gaps. The investment in a professional communication platform will pay for itself the first time it prevents a lawsuit.
Don't wait for a subpoena to realize your text messaging practices are putting your company at risk. The time to act is now, before your next casual work text becomes your most expensive business decision.
‍
